technical:slurm:scheduler-params

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision		 Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
technical:slurm:scheduler-params [2020-02-20 15:07] – freytechnical:slurm:scheduler-params [2020-02-26 15:20] – [Implementation] frey
Line 27: Line 27:
 |fair-share| 4000|see ''sshare''| |fair-share| 4000|see ''sshare''|
 |partition id| 2000|1.0 for all partitions| |partition id| 2000|1.0 for all partitions|
-|job size| 1|all cores in cluster=1.0|+|job size| 1|all resources in partition=1.0|
  
 Next to priority access, wait time is the largest factor:  the longer a job waits to execute, the higher its priority to be scheduled.  This seems appropriate, but it competes against the fair-share factor, which prioritizes jobs for underserved users. Next to priority access, wait time is the largest factor:  the longer a job waits to execute, the higher its priority to be scheduled.  This seems appropriate, but it competes against the fair-share factor, which prioritizes jobs for underserved users.
Line 85: Line 85:
 |''PriorityWeightPartition''| 2000| 0| |''PriorityWeightPartition''| 2000| 0|
 |''PriorityWeightQOS''| 20000| 3221225472| |''PriorityWeightQOS''| 20000| 3221225472|
-|''PriorityWeightTRES''| unset| ''cpu=819,mem=245,gpu=245,node=327''|+|''PriorityWeightTRES''| unset| ''cpu=819,mem=245,GRES/gpu=245,node=327''|
 |''PriorityFlags''| ''FAIR_TREE,SMALL_RELATIVE_TO_TIME''| ''FAIR_TREE''| |''PriorityFlags''| ''FAIR_TREE,SMALL_RELATIVE_TO_TIME''| ''FAIR_TREE''|
  
Line 102: Line 102:
 ^Date ^Time ^Goal/Description ^ ^Date ^Time ^Goal/Description ^
 |2019-10-24| |Authoring of this document| |2019-10-24| |Authoring of this document|
-|2020-03-02|09:00|Implementation|+|2020-03-09|09:00|Implementation|